Quick Answer:
The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to dismiss hundreds of thousands of pending asylum applications—particularly from individuals who entered the U.S. unlawfully—and to rapidly place them into deportation proceedings. This represents an unprecedented shift in the role of USCIS, which has historically focused on adjudicating immigration benefits and providing immigration services, such as processing legal pathways and humanitarian programs, not enforcing removals. Critics say the move could devastate families, communities, and humanitarian protections. The policy could also severely impact family reunification parole and humanitarian parole programs, which are key legal pathways for families and individuals facing urgent humanitarian needs.
What Is the New Trump Asylum Dismissal Plan?
The administration’s new apparent strategy aims to:
- Dismiss affirmative asylum claims filed by migrants who initially entered the U.S. without authorization.
- Fast-track deportations of those migrants using expedited removal procedures.
- Empower USCIS to issue deportation orders directly, enabling the agency to take direct enforcement actions, a role traditionally reserved for ICE and CBP.
This represents a significant change to the U.S. asylum system and the enforcement of immigration laws.
This could affect hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who entered unlawfully but have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.
Who Will Be Affected?
- Migrants with pending affirmative asylum applications (applied through USCIS, not court).
- Individuals who entered the U.S. unlawfully but later sought protection by seeking asylum.
- Those who cannot prove continuous presence in the U.S. for two years or more.
- Immigrants whose asylum applications are deemed “legally deficient” by USCIS.
Individuals with pending applications for permanent residency or those holding temporary status may also be affected if their asylum claims are dismissed.
According to a 2023 federal report, about 25% of affirmative asylum applicants admitted entering unlawfully, amounting to at least 250,000 people.
What Is USCIS Now Authorized to Do?
Under a memo from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem:
- USCIS officers can now initiate expedited removal against asylum seekers, marking a shift in the traditional role of citizenship and immigration services.
- The agency may also enforce civil and criminal immigration violations.
- This marks a major departure from USCIS’s historical role as a benefits-focused agency.
These changes impact the overall immigration process and reflect broader border protection strategies.
Related Resource:USCIS Official Site
Background on Immigration Court[NEW]
Asylum Hearings and Court Proceedings[NEW]
Background on Immigration Court[NEW]
Asylum Hearings and Court Proceedings[NEW]
Why Is This Potential Change So Controversial?
1. Legal and Institutional Norms Are Being Upended
- For decades, USCIS has processed applications—not conducted enforcement.
- Experts say this shift blurs the line between adjudication and deportation. This change also impacts the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the agency responsible for immigration review, and disrupts the established immigration court system.
2. Due Process Concerns
- Migrants may be deported without a hearing before an immigration judge. The lack of access to legal counsel and reduced involvement of immigration judges raises serious concerns about due process protections for affected individuals.
- Asylum applicants can be removed under expedited removal if their case is dismissed.
3. Chilling Effect on Future Asylum Seekers
- Fear of deportation could deter legitimate asylum claims, as individuals may be discouraged from seeking asylum even if they meet the requirements under asylum law.
- Immigrants may be discouraged from applying—even if they qualify for protection.
New policies are requiring asylum seekers to meet stricter criteria and procedural hurdles, making it more difficult for those who seek asylum to access protections under asylum law.
4. Economic and Community Impact
- Many of those affected are long-term residents, workers, and parents.
- Their removal could harm families, employers, and local economies.
- Changes to asylum policy may also impact refugee resettlement programs and reduce support available to vulnerable populations.
Expert Quote:
“They’re turning the agency that we think of as providing immigration benefits into an enforcement arm for ICE.” – Sarah Mehta, ACLU
How Is Expedited Removal Being Used?
- The Trump administration expanded expedited removal nationwide in early 2025.
- Anyone unable to prove 2 years of continuous presence in the U.S. can be deported without a court hearing.
- Individuals subject to expedited removal may face immediate deportation and could be held in a detention center or one of the expanding network of detention centers while awaiting removal.
- USCIS’s new role allows them to trigger these removals directly.
Learn More:ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations
Is This Already Happening?
- Yes. Some migrants have already received asylum dismissal notices. Federal authorities, including USCIS and DHS, are actively involved in issuing these dismissal notices and initiating removal proceedings.
- CNN reviewed documents showing people with long-pending cases being denied without explanation or court review.
- It’s unclear how many have received these notices or how quickly the plan will be expanded.
How Is This Different from Past Policies?
- USCIS has never held unilateral authority to deport.
- ICE and CBP have traditionally handled removals.
- This change effectively makes USCIS a front-line enforcer.
Compared to previous administrations, this policy shift marks a significant departure. During the first Trump administration, early immigration enforcement measures focused on expanding detention infrastructure and implementing restrictive policies on asylum and deportation. The Biden administration, by contrast, adopted more lenient approaches, seeking to roll back many of those restrictions and prioritize humanitarian considerations. Now, the second Trump administration has introduced sweeping changes in its initial 100 days, intensifying border security, expanding detention, and imposing new limits on legal immigration pathways, representing a major overhaul of enforcement strategies and a reversal of Biden-era policies.
Human Rights Concerns
“The government should process asylum applications—not throw them out.” – Conchita Cruz, Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project
Legal Ambiguity
- It’s unclear whether this move violates administrative or constitutional protections.
- Lawsuits are likely if due process is denied.
- The Supreme Court may ultimately be called upon to resolve disputes over the legality of the new policy.
Community Consequences
- Many of those affected have U.S.-born children, jobs, and community roots.
- Advocates warn of sudden family separations and workplace disruptions. Some families may be affected by policies targeting individuals from a specific country immediately, resulting in abrupt separations.
What Should Migrants and Advocates Do Now?
- Review asylum application status immediately with an immigration attorney.
- Keep documentation of U.S. residency, employment, and tax filings.
- Prepare for possible notices of dismissal or expedited removal.
- Monitor updates from USCIS and DHS.
If you receive a dismissal or removal notice, be aware of your rights to file immigration appeals to challenge the decision and protect your legal rights.
Helpful Links:
FAQs on Trump administration’s reported plan to order USCIS to dismiss certain asylum cases to enable expedited removal
What is expedited removal, and how does it work?Expedited removal is a fast-track deportation process that allows immigration authorities to remove certain noncitizens without a hearing before an immigration judge. It is typically used for individuals who cannot prove they have been in the U.S. continuously for two years or more or who are deemed inadmissible at the border.
How is the Trump administration planning to use expedited removal through USCIS?The administration plans to authorize USCIS officers to dismiss certain affirmative asylum cases—especially where the applicant entered unlawfully—then immediately place those individuals into expedited removal proceedings. This bypasses the traditional role of ICE and eliminates the need for court hearings.
Who could be impacted by this change?Affirmative asylum applicants who entered the U.S. unlawfully, are not in removal proceedings, and are unable to demonstrate two years of continuous residence may be subject to immediate dismissal and deportation under this new policy.
Can USCIS legally issue removal orders without an immigration judge?Under current law, expedited removal can be initiated by designated immigration officers, typically from ICE or CBP. The Trump administration is expanding this authority to include USCIS officers, which is legally controversial and may face court challenges. Traditionally, removal proceedings are overseen by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), also known as the office for immigration review, which manages immigration courts and ensures due process.
What rights does an asylum seeker have under expedited removal?Individuals subject to expedited removal generally have limited rights. However, if they express a fear of return to their home country, they must be given a credible fear interview. If they pass, they may be referred for a full asylum hearing. Under the new policy, however, cases may be dismissed before such interviews are even conducted.
Can a dismissed asylum case be reopened or appealed?Possibly, but the mechanisms are limited. A motion to reopen can be filed, but if a person is already removed, that process becomes more difficult. Judicial review of expedited removal is also extremely limited by law.
What if the applicant has been living and working legally in the U.S. for years?Even long-term residents with pending asylum applications who entered unlawfully may be at risk. This includes people with U.S. citizen children, work permits, and years of tax filings. Legal presence and contributions to society may not prevent dismissal if the individual is subject to expedited removal.
Is this policy already in effect?While not officially announced, reports and notices reviewed by advocates indicate the policy is already being implemented in some cases. Some applicants have received dismissal notices without explanation or the chance for a hearing.
What is the legal basis for this move?The administration is using delegated authority under immigration law to redefine the enforcement role of USCIS and apply expedited removal more broadly. Critics argue this redefinition stretches legal boundaries and violates due process. The policy is being implemented in coordination with homeland security and customs enforcement agencies to strengthen border security and streamline removal processes.
What’s the difference between affirmative and defensive asylum?Affirmative asylum is requested by individuals not in removal proceedings, usually through USCIS. Defensive asylum is applied for during removal proceedings in immigration court. The new policy primarily targets affirmative applicants, making them more vulnerable to removal without a court hearing.
How many people could be affected?According to federal data, there are approximately 1.45 million pending affirmative asylum cases. About 25% of those applicants entered unlawfully, potentially exposing over 250,000 people to immediate risk under the new policy.
Is this the first time USCIS has been involved in removals?Historically, USCIS focused on processing immigration benefits, not enforcing deportation. This marks a significant shift, turning a benefits agency into an enforcement mechanism, and blurring long-standing institutional boundaries.
What steps should at-risk asylum applicants take right now?Applicants should consult an immigration attorney immediately, ensure they have documentation proving U.S. residency (especially if over two years), and prepare for the possibility of receiving a dismissal or expedited removal notice.
Could this policy be blocked in court?Possibly. Advocacy organizations like the ACLU may file lawsuits arguing violations of due process, statutory protections, or misuse of agency authority. Until courts intervene, however, the policy may proceed.
What happens if someone is deported after dismissal? Can they return legally later?In most cases, a person removed under expedited removal faces a five-year ban from reentry. If there is a prior removal order or other immigration violations, that period can be extended to ten years or permanently, unless a waiver is granted.
Does this change affect asylum seekers from countries with special protections like Venezuela or Ukraine?Potentially, yes. If those individuals applied for asylum affirmatively and entered unlawfully, they could be targeted. However, country-specific protections such as Temporary Protected Status (TPS) may shield some from expedited removal, depending on their legal status. Additionally, asylum cooperative agreements and country agreements between the U.S. and other nations may also influence eligibility and removal procedures for certain asylum seekers.
What is the role of ICE in this process under the new plan?ICE may still carry out the physical detention and removal, but the initial enforcement action—dismissal of asylum claims and issuance of removal orders—could now be handled entirely by USCIS under the administration’s directive.
What’s the broader goal behind this policy shift?The Trump administration’s objective is to significantly reduce the number of people eligible to remain in the U.S. through humanitarian protections. The plan aligns with broader efforts to eliminate what it views as “loopholes” in the asylum process.
Are there alternative paths to relief if someone’s asylum claim is dismissed?Some individuals may still be eligible for other forms of relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). However, these options are more limited and require stronger evidence, and eligibility depends on whether the person can remain in the country long enough to apply.
How can communities and employers support affected individuals?Community organizations can connect individuals to legal services, document their contributions, and advocate publicly. Employers can issue letters verifying employment and encourage affected individuals to seek legal help before receiving any notice of dismissal.
Final Thoughts: A Turning Point for U.S. Asylum
This potential development is one of the most significant shifts in U.S. asylum policy in decades. By converting an adjudicatory agency into an enforcement tool, the Trump administration is signaling a zero-tolerance posture on humanitarian relief for undocumented immigrants. These changes represent a fundamental transformation of the U.S. immigration system, affecting how policies, enforcement, and legal pathways are structured and implemented.
Advocates urge swift legal action and public awareness to ensure that the asylum process remains accessible and fair for those fleeing violence, persecution, and instability.
Need Legal Guidance? Contact Immigration Attorney Richard Herman
If you or someone you know has a pending asylum case or fears possible removal, don’t delay. The immigration landscape is changing rapidly.
Schedule a confidential consultation with veteran immigration attorney Richard Herman of Herman Legal Group. With decades of experience, Richard and his team help immigrants navigate complex policies, safeguard their rights, and fight deportation.
Book your consultation today: Schedule Here
