Minnesota Ammunition Manufacturer Contracts With ICE: 2025-2026

Using FY 2024–FY 2026 records from USAspending.gov, this guide identifies a Minnesota company supplying ammunition to ICE, explains what they provide, and places those contracts in legal, policy, and public-accountability context.

Why Minnesota Matters in ICE Contracting

Minnesota is home to major firearms and ammunition manufacturing infrastructure. As ICE has expanded armed enforcement operations, training, and tactical capacity, Minnesota company supplying ammunition to ICE suppliers have become part of ICE’s operational supply chain, particularly for duty ammunition used by armed agents in the field.

This article focuses on prime contracts awarded to Minnesota companies, not subcontractors or indirect vendors.

How This Analysis Was Conducted

Data was pulled from USAspending.gov using the following parameters:

• Funding Agency: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

• Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

• Recipient Location: Minnesota

• Award Type: Contracts

• Results:

  • Prime Contracts: 4

  • Each contract below is a delivery order issued directly by ICE.

Minnesota ICE Contractor Overview (FY 2024–FY 2026)

Primary Minnesota ICE Contractor

The Kinetic Group Sales LLC

Business Location:
1 Vista Way, Anoka, Minnesota 55303

Industry Classification:

• NAICS: 332992 – Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing

• PSC: 1305 – Ammunition, Through 30mm

The Kinetic Group is the sole Minnesota-based prime contractor identified in this dataset. Across multiple delivery orders, the company supplies duty ammunition for armed ICE agents, making them a key Minnesota company supplying ammunition to ICE.

ICE Contracts Awarded to The Kinetic Group (Detailed Breakdown)

1. .223 Remington Duty Ammunition (62 Grain)

• Prime Award ID: 70CMSW24FR0000013

• Total Obligations: $1,298,700

• Award Type: Delivery Order

• Period of Performance: February 6, 2024 – December 31, 2025

• Primary Place of Performance: Anoka, Minnesota

Purpose:
Procurement of .223 Remington caliber duty ammunition (62 grain) to support armed ICE agents operating in the field.

2. .223 Remington Duty Ammunition for ICE Firearms Programs

• Prime Award ID: 70CMSW22FR0000074

• Total Obligations: $1,017,022.14

• Outlays: $1,009,571.04

• Award Type: Delivery Order

• Period of Performance: July 7, 2022 – January 31, 2026

• Primary Place of Performance: Anoka, Minnesota

Purpose:
Purchase of .223 Remington duty ammunition in support of ICE firearms and training programs.

3. .223 Duty Ammunition for ICE-Serviced Agencies

• Prime Award ID: 70CMSW25FR0000004

• Total Obligations: $589,170.96

• Award Type: Delivery Order

• Period of Performance: February 19, 2025 – October 13, 2025

• Primary Place of Performance: Fort Benning, Georgia (manufactured in Minnesota)

Purpose:
Procurement of duty ammunition for ICE and ICE-serviced federal agencies, coordinated through ICE’s Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs.

4. 12-Gauge Projectile Ammunition

• Prime Award ID: 70CMSW26FR0000007

• Total Obligations: $17,304.12

• Award Type: Delivery Order

• Period of Performance: January 12, 2026 – February 28, 2026

• Primary Place of Performance: Anoka, Minnesota

Purpose:
Supply of 12-gauge projectile ammunition to support ICE operational needs.

Total Minnesota ICE Ammunition Contract Value

Across these four delivery orders:

• Total ICE Obligations to The Kinetic Group: ~$2.92 million

• Nature of Goods: Live duty ammunition

• End Use: Armed ICE enforcement, training, and tactical operations

What These Contracts Support in Practice

ICE firearms contracts are not administrative or logistical in nature. They support:

• Armed field operations

• Fugitive apprehension teams

• Tactical enforcement units

• Firearms training programs

• Officer safety and use-of-force readiness

These contracts therefore directly enable physical enforcement capacity, not just paperwork or detention administration.

Why Public Transparency Matters

ICE does not manufacture its own weapons or ammunition. Its ability to conduct armed enforcement depends on private-sector suppliers.

State-specific transparency allows the public to understand:

• Which local companies are part of federal enforcement infrastructure

• How much public money is spent

• What type of enforcement capacity is being funded

This information is relevant to:

• Journalists

• Researchers

• Policymakers

• Investors

• Consumers

• Community advocates

Lawful Civic Response and Consumer Choice

It is legal to:

• Research federal contracts

• Publish factual information

• Express opposition to ICE enforcement policy

• Choose not to support companies that supply ICE

• Encourage others to make informed consumer decisions

It is not appropriate to engage in harassment, threats, or illegal activity. Peaceful, factual advocacy and ethical boycotts are lawful forms of civic participation.

How to Verify This Data Yourself

Anyone can independently confirm or expand this research by using USAspending.gov and applying filters for:

• Funding Agency: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

• Award Type: Contracts

• Recipient Location: Minnesota

• Fiscal Year: 2024–2026

Each award record includes:

• Contract ID

• Dollar amount

• Product description

• Place of performance

• NAICS and PSC codes

Key Takeaway

As of FY 2026, Minnesota’s role in ICE contracting is concentrated in one area: ammunition manufacturing. Through multiple delivery orders, a Minnesota-based company supplies live duty ammunition used by armed ICE agents nationwide.

Understanding this supply chain is essential for any serious discussion of:

• Immigration enforcement

• Federal spending priorities

• Corporate accountability

• Ethical consumer response

How to Lawfully Boycott Companies Doing Business With ICE

Boycotts are a lawful expression of consumer choice and free speech when conducted peacefully and without coercion. If you oppose a company’s role in supporting ICE operations, you may choose not to purchase its products or services and encourage others—respectfully and factually—to do the same.

What a Lawful Boycott Looks Like

• Personal consumer decisions: choosing alternatives and withholding spending

• Fact-based communication: citing verified public records (e.g., federal contract data)

• Clear objectives: requesting transparency, review, or non-renewal of contracts

• Peaceful expression: no threats, intimidation, or harassment

What a Boycott Is Not

• Harassment or repeated unwanted contact

• Threats, intimidation, or doxxing

• Property damage, trespass, or disruption of lawful operations

• Violence or encouragement of violence

Step-by-Step: Starting a Peaceful, Effective Boycott

1. Define the Ask
   Be specific about what you want (e.g., disclosure, policy review, non-renewal). Vague demands reduce impact.

2. Verify the Facts
   Confirm the contract, dollar amounts, dates, and services using public sources. Accuracy builds credibility.

3. Lead With Your Own Choices
   Explain your personal decision not to buy or use the company’s products/services—and why—without attacking employees or customers.

4. Communicate Respectfully With the Company
   Send a concise, polite message requesting transparency or reconsideration. Keep it factual and non-threatening.

5. Educate Before Mobilizing
   Share short explainers that cite public records so others can decide for themselves.

6. Set Guardrails
   Publish a code of conduct: respectful tone, no harassment, no threats, no illegal activity.

Joining Existing Boycott Efforts (Instead of Starting From Scratch)

Often, it is more effective to join or support existing campaigns than to duplicate them.

• Research current initiatives focused on ICE vendors or enforcement accountability.

• Follow organizers’ rules and messaging guidelines.

• Contribute constructively: share verified information, help with research, or amplify lawful calls to action.

• Avoid pile-ons: do not target individual employees or private persons.

Coordination increases reach while reducing misinformation and conflict.

Using Social Media Responsibly

Social platforms can amplify awareness when used carefully.

Best Practices

• Share verified links and concise summaries

• Use calm, values-based language

• Frame posts as personal consumer choice

• Encourage peaceful boycotts and transparency

Avoid

• Insults, threats, or inflammatory rhetoric

• Tagging individual employees or unrelated people

• Sharing personal information

• Coordinated harassment or “dogpiling”

Example Posts (Respectful)

• “I’m choosing not to support companies with ICE contracts after reviewing public records. Here’s the data so others can decide for themselves.”

• “Transparency matters. Based on federal contract records, this company supplies ICE. I’m asking for a public review of that relationship.”

Respect, Safety, and the Law: Non-Negotiable Principles

• No violence. Ever.

• No harassment or threats.

• No illegal activity.

• No targeting of individuals.

Peaceful, lawful advocacy protects participants, preserves credibility, and is more likely to influence corporate decision-making.

Why Peaceful Pressure Can Work

Companies respond to:

• Reputational risk grounded in accurate reporting

• Investor and consumer concerns expressed professionally

• Clear, achievable requests aligned with stated corporate values

Harassment and threats undermine legitimacy and can backfire.

Existing Online Efforts to Boycott ICE Vendors — and How to Join

The initiatives below are public-facing, well-documented efforts centered on consumer choice, transparency, and peaceful advocacy. Participation should always remain lawful, non-violent, and non-harassing.

1. No Tech for ICE

What it is:
A long-running advocacy campaign opposing technology, data, and surveillance contracts with ICE and CBP.

Primary focus:

• Tech and data vendors

• Surveillance and analytics tools

• Cloud and digital infrastructure used in enforcement

How to join:

• Visit https://notechforice.com

• Sign public statements or petitions

• Share campaign explainers on social media

• Participate in workplace, campus, or community discussions using campaign toolkits

Tone & rules:
Fact-based, non-violent, policy-focused. No harassment of individuals.

2. Boycott ICE (BoycottICE.com / ICEBREAKERS)

What it is:
An online hub aggregating information about ICE contractors and providing guidance on ethical consumer boycotts.

Primary focus:

• Consumer awareness

• Corporate accountability

• Education around ICE’s private-sector partners

How to join:

• Visit https://boycottice.com

• Review company lists and educational materials

• Share resources with attribution

• Participate in peaceful, consumer-based actions

Tone & rules:
Emphasizes informed choice and public education; rejects threats or intimidation.

3. Not With My Dollars

What it is:
A consumer-focused boycott campaign urging people to withhold spending from companies perceived as enabling ICE, particularly during high-visibility shopping periods.

Primary focus:

• Retail and consumer brands

• Seasonal pressure (e.g., Black Friday)

How to join:

• Learn about targeted campaigns through public reporting

• Reduce or redirect personal spending

• Share verified reporting explaining why companies are targeted

• Encourage others to make informed consumer choices

Tone & rules:
Consumer choice only; no harassment or coercion.

4. Grassroots & Social Media–Based Efforts (Decentralized)

What they are:
Independent community-led initiatives on platforms like X (Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, and Reddit that compile public records and discuss ethical boycotts.

Common formats:

• Infographics citing federal contract data

• Threads explaining how to use USAspending.gov

• Community discussions about consumer alternatives

How to join responsibly:

• Follow pages that cite sources

• Verify claims before sharing

• Add context, not outrage

• Avoid tagging or targeting individual employees

Important note:
Because these efforts are decentralized, participants should be especially careful to avoid misinformation and harassment.

5. How to Join Without Starting Something New

If you don’t want to launch a campaign yourself:

1. Amplify responsibly
   Share sourced explainers from existing campaigns.

2. Practice ethical consumer choice
   Withhold spending quietly and explain your reasons when asked.

3. Engage respectfully
   Contact companies politely to request transparency or review.

4. Follow codes of conduct
   Many campaigns publish participation guidelines—follow them.

Ground Rules for Participation (Read First)

All reputable efforts share these principles:

• Peaceful and lawful action only

• No harassment, threats, or intimidation

• No doxxing or targeting of individuals

• No violence or property damage

• Use verified, public information

These guardrails protect participants and preserve credibility.

Why Joining Existing Efforts Matters

• Reduces duplication and misinformation

• Aligns messaging and timing

• Increases visibility with less risk

• Keeps advocacy focused on policy and accountability—not individuals

Note

You have the right to research public contracts, express disagreement, and make ethical consumer choices. Exercising those rights responsibly and peacefully strengthens public discourse and keeps advocacy effective.

You can oppose corporate support for ICE without harassment or harm by joining existing, peaceful efforts grounded in consumer choice, transparency, and verified data.

Frequently Asked Questions: Minnesota Companies Contracting With ICE

1. Which Minnesota companies currently contract with ICE?

Based on federal contracting records covering FY 2024–FY 2026, Minnesota-based prime contracts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in this dataset involve ammunition manufacturing and supply. The identified Minnesota contractor supplies duty ammunition used by armed ICE agents.

2. What types of products or services do Minnesota companies provide to ICE?

The Minnesota contracts identified here involve:

• .223 Remington duty ammunition (62 grain)

• 12-gauge projectile ammunition

These products support ICE firearms programs, training, and armed field operations.

3. How much federal money is involved in Minnesota ICE contracts?

Across multiple delivery orders in this dataset, ICE obligations to the Minnesota contractor total approximately $2.9 million over several fiscal years. Exact amounts and dates vary by delivery order.

4. How can I verify Minnesota ICE contracts myself?

You can independently verify ICE contracts by using USAspending.gov and applying these filters:

• Funding Agency: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

• Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

• Recipient Location: Minnesota

• Award Type: Contracts

• Fiscal Year: Select the relevant year(s)

Each award record lists the company name, contract value, product description, and place of performance.

5. Why focus on Minnesota specifically?

State-level analysis improves transparency by showing how local companies participate in federal immigration enforcement. Minnesota-specific data is especially relevant for journalists, policymakers, investors, consumers, and community members within the state.

6. What do these ammunition contracts mean in practice?

Unlike administrative or detention-support services, ammunition contracts directly support armed enforcement capacity, including:

• Firearms training

• Officer readiness

• Tactical enforcement operations

This makes them a distinct category of ICE contracting.

7. Is it legal to boycott companies that do business with ICE?

Yes. Peaceful boycotts and ethical consumer advocacy are lawful, provided they do not involve harassment, threats, intimidation, property damage, or violence. Choosing not to purchase products or services and encouraging others to make informed choices is legal.

8. Can I contact Minnesota companies to express concerns?

Yes. Members of the public may lawfully and respectfully contact companies to:

• Request transparency

• Ask for policy review

• Express disagreement with ICE contracting

Communications should remain factual, polite, and non-harassing.

9. Does Herman Legal Group support harassment or violence?

No. Herman Legal Group supports lawful, peaceful civic engagement only, including research, public education, and ethical consumer choice. Harassment, threats, violence, or illegal activity are never appropriate or effective.

10. Where can I learn more about ICE vendors and boycott efforts?

This article’s Resource Directory links to:

• Federal transparency tools

• Independent research and journalism

• Herman Legal Group articles on ICE vendors, enforcement, and lawful boycotts

These resources provide verified data and legal context for further research.

Resource Directory: Minnesota, ICE Contractors & Lawful Civic Response

Herman Legal Group (HLG): ICE Contractors, Budgets & Boycotts

Primary legal analysis and public-facing guidance

• Herman Legal Group – Immigration Law Blog
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/blog/
  HLG’s central hub for enforcement analysis, federal contracting context, and public-interest immigration reporting.

• Weaken ICE: Join the Boycott ICE Vendors Campaign
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/weaken-ice-join-the-boycott-ice-vendors-campaigns/
  HLG’s flagship explainer on lawful, ethical boycotts; how private companies support ICE; and guardrails against harassment or illegal conduct.

• Companies That Do Business With ICE
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/companies-that-do-business-with-ice/
  Step-by-step guidance on identifying ICE vendors, understanding contract types, and engaging in fact-based public accountability.

• Black Friday ICE Boycott Guide
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/black-friday-ice-boycott-guide-2025/
  Explains seasonal consumer-pressure strategies, emphasizing peaceful, voluntary consumer choice.

• Which Companies Are Facing Boycott for Role in Immigration Enforcement
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/which-companies-are-facing-boycott-for-role-in-trumps-immigration-enforcement/
  Case-based discussion of public scrutiny and corporate response.

• How ICE Built a Surveillance Regime
  https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/how-ice-built-a-surveillance-regime-ice-surveillance-state-2025/
  Context on technology, procurement, and private-sector enablement of enforcement capacity.

Federal Transparency & Contract Verification (Primary Sources)

• USAspending.gov
  https://www.usaspending.gov
  Official database for federal awards. Use Advanced Search to filter by ICE, Minnesota, fiscal year, and contract type.

• System for Award Management (SAM.gov)
  https://sam.gov
  Contractor registrations, entity details, and eligibility information.

• GSA eLibrary
  https://www.gsaelibrary.gsa.gov
  Federal schedule holders and contract vehicles used by DHS and ICE.

• Department of Homeland Security – Budget & Performance
  https://www.dhs.gov/budget
  DHS and ICE funding context and program descriptions.

ICE Enforcement, Oversight & Data

• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  https://www.ice.gov
  Official ICE materials and program descriptions.

• DHS Office of Inspector General
  https://www.oig.dhs.gov
  Audits and oversight reports relevant to ICE operations and procurement.

• Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC Immigration)
  https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/
  Independent data on ICE enforcement trends and outcomes.

Minnesota-Relevant Context & Civic Information

• Minnesota Department of Public Safety
  https://dps.mn.gov
  State-level public safety context; useful for understanding how federal enforcement intersects locally.

• ACLU of Minnesota
  https://www.aclu-mn.org
  Civil liberties reporting and guidance relevant to enforcement, protest rights, and public accountability.

• Minnesota Reformer
  https://minnesotareformer.com
  State-focused investigative journalism and policy reporting.

Lawful Advocacy, Boycotts & Free Speech (Education)

• Know Your Rights: Peaceful Protest & Free Speech (General guidance)
  https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/protesters-rights
  Legal boundaries and protections for peaceful advocacy and consumer boycotts.