Quick Answer
The U.S. government is expected to pause immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, reportedly beginning January 21, 2026, based on multiple major news reports. The reported rationale is that applicants from certain countries are perceived as having a higher risk of welfare dependency, which connects to the U.S. immigration concept commonly called “public charge.” The pause, referred to as the immigrant visa pause, is reported to focus on immigrant visas processed through U.S. consulates abroad, not most temporary visas like tourist or student visas.
Reporting sources:
Fast Facts / Key Takeaways
-
The U.S. is expected to pause immigrant visa processing for applicants from 75 countries starting January 21, 2026, according to reports.
This immigrant visa pause reflects growing concerns regarding immigration policy and its impact on various nations.
-
Early reporting suggests the pause may be indefinite (no public end date announced).
-
The stated reason involves perceived risk that migrants from certain countries may rely on public benefits (the “public charge” concept).
-
The pause appears aimed at immigrant visas issued through consular processing, not most nonimmigrant visa categories.
-
USCIS approvals of petitions like the I-130 or I-140 are a different step from State Department visa issuance.
-
Families should prepare for longer separation timelines and possible interview disruptions.
-
Financial sponsorship and documentary readiness are likely to be more important if/when processing resumes.
Countries Named in Reporting So Far (Partial List)
As of current reporting, a complete official list of all 75 countries has not been consistently published in one public government release. However, major outlets have named several countries as examples included in the reported pause. These include:
HLG editorial note: This is a partial list only and reflects countries specifically named in reporting, not the full set of 75.
What This Policy Change Actually Does (And What It Does Not)
This is a pause in “immigrant visa processing” at U.S. consulates
Immigrant visas are issued by the U.S. Department of State and allow a person to enter the United States as a lawful permanent resident (green card holder).
If immigrant visa processing is paused for a country, it can mean:
-
immigrant visa interviews may not be scheduled,
-
scheduled interviews may be canceled or delayed,
-
completed cases may sit without a final decision,
-
visas may not be issued even when the underlying petition is approved.
A key point for families: a pause in visa processing does not always mean a petition is denied. It typically means the last stage—consular issuance—is delayed or stopped.
For official baseline information about immigrant visa steps, see:
This is not the same thing as a USCIS petition (I-130 or I-140)
Many families confuse two separate systems:
USCIS (Department of Homeland Security)
USCIS decides whether a petition is valid, such as:
U.S. Department of State (NVC + U.S. consulates)
The State Department controls:
-
National Visa Center (NVC) document collection
-
Consular interview scheduling
-
Immigrant visa issuance abroad
If the U.S. pauses consular processing, a family can be “approved” on paper (petition stage) but still unable to complete the visa issuance step.
When Does the Immigrant Visa Pause Start, and How Long Will It Last?
Reported start date: January 21, 2026
According to the reporting above, the immigrant visa processing pause is expected to begin January 21, 2026.
Reported duration: indefinite (no confirmed end date yet)
The reporting describes the measure as open-ended or without a publicly confirmed end date. That is important because families cannot reliably plan around a fixed reopening timeline.
At this stage, the most responsible guidance is:
-
prepare your case for delay, and
-
avoid missing deadlines for your underlying petition or NVC requests.
For general State Department guidance and updates, start here:
Which Visas Are Affected (And Which Are Not)
Affected: immigrant visas processed through consular processing
The pause is reported as an immigrant visa processing suspension. In real life, this tends to affect cases like:
-
U.S. citizen sponsoring a spouse abroad (IR-1/CR-1)
-
U.S. citizen sponsoring a parent abroad (IR-5)
-
Lawful permanent resident sponsoring a spouse or child (F2A/F2B)
-
Employment-based immigrant visa cases (EB-1/EB-2/EB-3) requiring consular issuance
If your case is in the consular pipeline, your steps typically run through NVC:
Likely not affected (based on current reporting): most nonimmigrant visas
Current reporting indicates the policy primarily impacts immigrant visas, not typical nonimmigrant visa categories such as:
-
B-1/B-2 (tourist/business visitors)
-
F-1 (students)
-
J-1 (exchange visitors)
-
H-1B (specialty occupation workers)
-
O-1 (extraordinary ability)
However, applicants should understand this nuance:
-
A nonimmigrant visa category may remain “open,” but
-
consular appointment availability and administrative processing delays can still change rapidly.
For baseline information:
Why These 75 Countries? The “Public Charge” / Welfare-Dependence Rationale (Explained Clearly)
What “public charge” means in plain English
“Public charge” is a U.S. immigration concept that generally refers to whether a person is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support in the future.
In everyday terms, the government may scrutinize:
-
whether an immigrant has strong financial support,
-
whether a sponsor meets income requirements,
-
whether the person has realistic ability to work or be supported,
-
whether household resources are strong enough to prevent long-term dependence.
USCIS explains public charge (and related inadmissibility concepts) here:
What consular officers typically evaluate in practice (not politics, not speculation)
Even when a policy is described broadly, individual decisions often turn on concrete evidence.
In many family-based immigrant visa cases, the government focuses heavily on:
-
the sponsor’s income level
-
household size
-
work stability
-
assets and savings
-
consistency of documentation
-
whether a joint sponsor is needed
This is why your documentation quality matters as much as your eligibility.
If your case requires an Affidavit of Support, review:
Why “these countries” specifically?
The policy rationale in reporting ties to perceived welfare dependency/public charge concerns.
Country-level targeting implies the government is making group-level risk judgments rather than purely individualized evaluations.
Even then, a person from a targeted country may have a strong case with strong sponsorship evidence.
What Happens to Pending Cases? (Family, Employer, and Human Reality)
If your I-130 petition is still pending with USCIS
If you are still in the USCIS stage, you may still be able to:
-
proceed with the petition,
-
respond to Requests for Evidence (RFEs),
-
reach approval.
But you may face a future bottleneck at consular issuance.
Start here:
HLG related guidance:
-
Herman Legal Group (HLG home)
If your case is already at the National Visa Center (NVC)
Many applicants are at one of these NVC stages:
-
“submitted documents”
-
“documentarily complete”
-
“documentarily qualified”
-
“ready for interview scheduling”
If immigrant visa processing is paused for your country, then:
-
interviews may not be scheduled,
-
previously scheduled interviews may be delayed,
-
cases may remain pending even if everything is correct.
If you already had an immigrant visa interview scheduled
If you have a scheduled appointment date coming up, you must plan for outcomes such as:
-
cancellation,
-
rescheduling,
-
administrative hold,
-
delay in issuance.
Do not assume the interview will happen.
Also do not assume your case is denied.
In many consular interruptions, the result is simply time.
What Applicants Should Do Right Now (Practical Checklist)
1) Do not abandon or withdraw a valid case without legal advice
Withdrawing and refiling can:
-
reset your priority date (in some categories),
-
create new documentary burdens,
-
delay reunification even longer.
In most cases, keeping the case alive is the best move.
2) Prepare your “financial sponsorship” file as if you will be reviewed tomorrow
Even if interviews pause, many families lose time later because they are not ready when the consulate restarts.
You should gather and organize:
-
most recent tax return and/or IRS transcript
-
W-2s / 1099s
-
employment verification letter
-
pay stubs (recent)
-
proof of assets (if needed)
-
joint sponsor documentation (if needed)
Official starting points:
3) Keep your civil documents current and scan everything
Create a secure folder with:
-
passport biographic page
-
birth certificates
-
marriage certificates (if applicable)
-
divorce decrees (if applicable)
-
police certificates (watch expiration practices)
-
translations (if not in English)
4) Track updates from official government sources first
Avoid relying on social media summaries.
Start here:
Scenario-Based Analysis (Real Families, Real Case Stages)
Scenario 1: U.S. citizen sponsoring a spouse abroad (case at NVC)
Risk level: Medium
What likely happens: Documentarily qualified cases may wait indefinitely for scheduling.
Best next step: Build a “perfect sponsorship packet” and preserve relationship evidence.
Scenario 2: Lawful permanent resident sponsoring a child abroad (priority date issues)
Risk level: Medium to High (depending on visa bulletin category)
What likely happens: Even if your priority date becomes current, consular issuance may be paused.
Best next step: Monitor timing and avoid document lapses.
Start here:
Scenario 3: Employer-sponsored immigrant case with a job start date
Risk level: High
What likely happens: The employee cannot enter as an immigrant until visas are issued.
Best next step: Employers should explore alternate lawful work options where available and plan staffing contingencies.
Scenario 4: Applicant has strong sponsor income but country is affected
Risk level: Low to Medium
What likely happens: Delay is policy-driven, not fact-driven.
Best next step: Stay document-ready and avoid avoidable errors that create extra delays later.
Scenario 5: Interview scheduled in the next 2–3 weeks
Risk level: High
What likely happens: Rescheduling or consular hold.
Best next step: Follow the consulate’s instructions and preserve proof of appointments and submissions.
Avalanche of Visa Restrictions: Trump Administration Actions Over the Past 12 Months Intended to Slow Down or Stop Visa Issuance (Jan 2025–Jan 2026)
January 2025: Executive Order framing “enhanced vetting” and security screening
-
What changed: The administration issued Executive Order 14161, directing enhanced screening/vetting priorities and related implementation across immigration and visa systems.
-
Resource links:
June 2025: Travel/entry restrictions reinstated or expanded (country-based proclamation)
-
What changed: A June 4, 2025 proclamation imposed/expanded country-based entry restrictions, effective June 9, 2025, citing national security and vetting deficiencies.
-
Resource links:
September 2025: H-1B entry restrictions + “$100,000 fee” for new cases (major legal-immigration restriction)
-
What changed: A September 19, 2025 proclamation restricted entry/visa issuance for certain H-1B workers and introduced a $100,000 payment requirement for specified new H-1B-related filings/issuance mechanics (implementation details discussed in agency guidance and litigation reporting).
-
Resource links:
Consular “Roadblocks” (Policies That Slow Down Visa Issuance Even Without a Formal Ban)
September–December 2025: Third-country visa processing restricted (“no third-country” consular shopping)
-
What changed: The State Department moved toward stricter rules and warnings that applicants should generally apply in their country of nationality or residence, making it harder to use third-country processing as a workaround for long waits at home.
-
Resource links:
September–October 2025: Interview waiver tightened (fewer applicants eligible for dropbox/waivers)
-
What changed: The State Department updated interview waiver eligibility effective October 1, 2025, increasing the likelihood of in-person interviews and slowing overall processing capacity.
-
Resource links:
Social Media Screening / Expanded Vetting (Evidence Burdens and Processing Delay Drivers)
Late 2025: Social media identifiers + expanded vetting architecture
-
What changed: The administration expanded screening infrastructure linked to Executive Order–driven vetting priorities, including more scrutiny around digital identity and social media.
-
Resource links:
Public Charge as a Visa Gatekeeper (Financial + Health + “Likelihood of Welfare Use”)
November 2025: DHS proposed rollback/rescission of 2022 public charge regulations
-
What changed: DHS proposed rescinding the 2022 regulatory framework and moving toward broader discretion under the “public charge” concept—raising the risk of more subjective adjudication and more evidence demands.
-
Resource links:
Late 2025: Consular focus expands to age/health/finances (including chronic conditions)
-
What changed: Reporting and policy analysis indicates consular officers were directed to weigh factors such as age and health, including chronic conditions, when assessing public charge likelihood—raising concerns for applicants with conditions requiring long-term management.
-
Resource links:
December 2025: Expanded travel ban / visa issuance restrictions effective January 1, 2026
-
What changed: A December 16, 2025 proclamation expanded/modified country-based restrictions, with implementation effective January 1, 2026, supported by a White House fact sheet and State Department implementation guidance.
-
Resource links:
January 2026: Immigrant visa processing paused for nationals of 75 countries (public charge / welfare-dependence rationale)
-
What changed: The State Department announced a pause on immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, beginning January 21, 2026, tied to public assistance/public charge concerns.
-
Resource links:
The Real-World Impact: Visa Delays Function Like a Denial in Slow Motion for Families and Businesses
A “visa processing pause” is often described as a temporary administrative measure. In real life, it can operate like a denial without paperwork: families remain separated, employers lose predictability, and cases become trapped in document expiration cycles even when the applicant is otherwise eligible.
1) Families Pay the Highest Price: Separation, Instability, and Preventable Harm
When immigrant visa processing slows or stops at U.S. consulates, the cost is measured in months or years of forced separation, even for close relatives of U.S. citizens.
Common consequences include:
-
Spouses living apart indefinitely, often forced to maintain two households and two sets of expenses
-
Children growing up with one parent missing, creating childcare and schooling stress
-
Missed life events (births, medical crises, funerals, weddings) that cannot be rescheduled
-
Financial strain from travel changes, repeated document fees, and continued overseas living costs
-
Mental health impacts (anxiety, depression, chronic stress) created by prolonged uncertainty and lack of timeline certainty
Even “routine” delays can become severe when families must repeatedly update the same evidence because the government’s required documents have limited validity.
2) Document Expiration Traps: Delays That Reset the Clock
One of the most overlooked harms of consular slowdowns is the expiration loop—when the case becomes harder to complete the longer it sits.
Examples include:
-
Police certificate validity limitations depending on the country and consular practice
-
Medical exam timing and re-exams
-
Updated financial sponsorship evidence needed repeatedly
-
Re-upload and re-review delays through the National Visa Center pipeline
For baseline consular processing mechanics, see:
3) Employers Lose Time, Talent, and Contracts — Not Just “Convenience”
When immigration becomes unpredictable, U.S. businesses experience operational harm that is measurable and immediate.
Typical business impacts include:
-
Delayed start dates for key hires
-
Project disruption and missed deliverables
-
Lost contracts when deadlines cannot be met
-
Higher legal and administrative costs due to repeated rescheduling and re-documentation
-
Long-term recruiting damage, as global candidates choose more predictable countries
In practice, visa slowdowns discourage companies from hiring internationally at all—especially for specialized positions that require careful timing.
4) Why This Matters Even for “Strong Cases”
A processing pause does not mean a person is inadmissible. It means the government is using timing and friction as a control mechanism. That distinction is critical for families deciding whether to keep going.
If a case requires an Affidavit of Support (common in family immigration), the sponsor should prepare for heightened scrutiny and documentation demands:
HLG internal resources (I-864 + sponsorship):
Disparate Impact and Pretext Concerns: What the Public Record Shows About “Public Charge” Framing and Country Targeting
Many readers have asked whether a country-based visa suspension tied to “welfare dependence” concerns is truly about individualized financial risk—or whether it is being used as a broader tool to shape who can immigrate to the United States.
It is important to separate two questions:
-
What does the policy do in practice (impact)?
-
Why was it adopted (intent)?
Even when a policy is described as neutral on paper, it can create unequal outcomes depending on which countries are targeted and how standards are applied.
1) Country-Based Restrictions Can Create Unequal Outcomes Even Without Saying So Explicitly
A visa policy that pauses entire nationalities functions as group-based screening. That makes “public charge” less about individual documents and more about country-level assumptions—a shift that can disproportionately affect applicants from lower-income regions.
If the affected list is weighted toward countries outside Western Europe, then the result is predictable:
-
immigrant visas become harder to obtain for many applicants from the Global South, and
-
comparatively easier for applicants from regions not subject to similar friction.
Even without a formal “race” classification, national-origin restrictions frequently map onto race, ethnicity, and global inequality.
2) Public Statements About “Preferred” Immigration Sources Are Part of the Record
Concerns about disparate treatment are heightened by long-standing public reporting that President Trump has favored immigration from certain countries while disparaging others.
For example, Trump has been repeatedly linked in public reporting to derogatory remarks about immigrants from “shithole countries,” and comments suggesting preference for immigrants from countries like Norway.
Why this matters for “public charge” policies:
When a government uses “welfare dependence” narratives while simultaneously endorsing preference-based immigration rhetoric, critics may argue the policy is not merely about financial self-sufficiency—but about reshaping immigration flows by nationality and region.
3) How “Public Charge” Language Can Operate as a Proxy for Exclusion
“Public charge” is a real legal concept, but broad country-based processing pauses tied to welfare-dependence concerns can operate like a proxy for:
-
wealth screening
-
health screening
-
perceived future employability
-
and assumptions about public benefit usage
This is especially consequential because consular processing already involves discretion, and evidence standards can vary between posts.
For baseline public charge resources:
4) Project 2025 Shows How “Immigration Restriction by Friction” Can Be Systematized
Separate from any one policy announcement, many observers evaluate visa slowdowns in light of broader transition-era policy frameworks—especially Project 2025 materials that describe how to transform federal immigration infrastructure quickly.
Primary-source document:
Analytical overview (useful for journalists and researchers):
How this connects:
Even when policy does not announce a “ban,” restrictions can be implemented by:
-
tightening interview waivers,
-
limiting third-country visa processing,
-
increasing security screening burdens,
-
expanding documentary demands, and
-
slowing consular issuance capacity.
5) The Most Defensible Takeaway for Readers
A country-based immigrant visa processing pause tied to “public charge” concerns can be understood as a form of immigration restriction by delay, not merely immigration restriction by statute.
That is why the practical consequences matter:
-
who can realistically survive multi-year separation,
-
who can maintain documentation and sponsorship standards repeatedly, and
-
which regions face the greatest friction.
My observation:
“Whether framed as ‘public charge prevention’ or ‘security vetting,’ a national-origin processing pause shifts the immigrant visa system away from individualized evidence and toward country-level exclusion by delay.”
Frequently Asked Questions
1) Which 75 countries are affected by the immigrant visa processing pause?
As of initial reporting, the U.S. is expected to pause immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, but a single complete official list has not been consistently published in public reporting. Applicants should monitor the U.S. Department of State and their local U.S. consulate for confirmed country-specific implementation.
2) When does the immigrant visa processing pause start?
Major news outlets report the pause begins on January 21, 2026. If your case is close to interview scheduling, you should plan for delays and keep all documentation current.
3) Is this a ban or a “processing pause”?
Based on reporting, it is best described as a processing pause—meaning visa issuance steps may stop or slow. A pause does not necessarily mean your petition is denied, but it can stop final visa approval at a consulate.
4) Does this affect tourist visas or student visas?
Current reporting indicates this measure targets immigrant visa processing, not most temporary visas such as tourist (B-1/B-2) or student (F-1) visas. Still, consulate appointment availability and processing times can change at any time.
5) If my I-130 is approved, can my spouse still immigrate?
An approved I-130 is only one step. If consular immigrant visa processing is paused for your spouse’s country, the case may be delayed at interview scheduling or visa issuance.
6) What if my case is already “documentarily qualified” at NVC?
If you are documentarily qualified, your case may still wait for an interview slot and final issuance. A processing pause can stop interviews or prevent visas from being issued even after a successful interview.
7) Can I speed up my immigrant visa case during a pause?
In many cases, there is no reliable way to force consular processing during a broad pause. The best strategy is to keep documents current, strengthen sponsorship evidence, and follow official consulate instructions carefully.
8) What does “public charge” mean for immigrant visa applicants?
Public charge generally refers to whether an applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on government assistance in the future. In many cases, strong financial sponsorship evidence and consistent documentation reduce concerns and improve case clarity.
9) Will using public benefits automatically destroy my immigrant visa case?
Not always. Public charge analysis is complicated and depends on the specific benefit, the person receiving it, and the case type. Applicants should get case-specific legal advice before assuming the case is “unfixable.”
10) What should I do while I wait?
Keep your passport valid, protect your civil documents, track official consular instructions, and prepare updated financial sponsorship materials. When processing resumes, the most prepared applicants often move faster.
11) Should I withdraw my case and refile later?
Usually not. Withdrawing can increase delays, create new paperwork requirements, and introduce unnecessary risk. Many families are better served by preserving the current case and preparing for eventual resumption.
12) Can a lawyer help if visa processing is paused?
Yes. A lawyer can help keep your case “document-ready,” avoid missed deadlines, identify alternative strategies, and prepare stronger financial sponsorship evidence so the case is positioned to move as soon as processing restarts.
What This Means Going Forward
This reported immigrant visa processing pause—tied to perceived “public charge” or welfare-dependence concerns—could change quickly depending on internal government instructions, litigation, or revised diplomatic guidance. For families and employers, the most important thing is to stay ready: protect your documentation, monitor official updates, and avoid avoidable mistakes that cause additional delays once processing resumes.
If your family’s case is time-sensitive or you are unsure how this may affect your country or visa category, you can speak with an immigration attorney to plan next steps. You may schedule a consultation here:
Herman Legal Group – Book a Consultation
Resource Directory: I-864 Sponsorship + Public Charge + Health-Related Inadmissibility Concerns (2026)
Official U.S. Government Sources (Primary Authority)
HLG Internal Resources (I-864 + Public Charge + Health Concerns)
HLG: Public Charge + Health-Related Risk (Diabetes, Obesity/Overweight, Chronic Conditions)
Reporting Sources (75-Country Immigrant Visa Processing Pause)
-
Reuters — U.S. to suspend visa processing for 75 nations (report)
-
The Washington Post — Immigrant visa processing pause coverage
-
CNN — U.S. suspending immigrant visa processing for 75 countries
