QUICK ANSWER

Yes—the United States has confined civilians en masse before. During World War II, more than 120,000 Japanese Americans, most of them U.S. citizens, were detained without criminal charges in internment camps. Today, ICE’s warehouse-style detention plan revives key structural features of that history: civil confinement without trial, mass processing, and restricted legal access. The contexts differ, but the constitutional warning is the same—when civil detention scales, due process collapses first.

FAST FACTS

Type of detention: Civil, not criminal
Criminal charges required: No
Historical precedent: WWII Japanese American internment
Current trend: Record-high ICE detention with planned expansion
Primary risk: Systemic due process failure

For the full legal and policy analysis of ICE’s new system, see:
ICE’s Warehouse Detention Plan: What It Means for Immigrants, Detention Conditions, and Legal Rights

A Forgotten Truth: America Has Built “Camps” Before

In 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, authorizing the forced removal and confinement of people of Japanese ancestry.

Key facts documented by historians and the U.S. government itself:

No criminal charges were required
No individualized hearings were provided
Two-thirds of detainees were U.S. citizens
Families were confined for years behind barbed wire

Authoritative historical sources:

The government repeatedly insisted this was not punishment—but civil confinement justified by fear.

Why Immigration Detention Is Civil—and Why That Matters

Immigration detention is not criminal incarceration.

Courts have long described it as administrative and preventive, not punitive. That means:

No jury trial
No criminal conviction
No fixed sentence
Detention justified by status, not guilt

This distinction is central to modern enforcement.

As the Supreme Court has recognized, civil detention is constitutional only if it remains limited and reasonably related to its stated purpose.

HLG legal context:

ICE’s Warehouse Detention Plan: What Is Actually Changing

Investigative reporting confirms ICE is planning a structural expansion, not incremental growth.

Key reporting:

What changes under this model:

Mega-facilities holding thousands at once
A hub-and-spoke “feeder system”
Increased transfers
Greater reliance on private contractors

HLG data explainer:

ICE Detainee Population Reaches Record High in 2025

What This System Replicates From WWII Internment

This comparison is about structure, not equivalence of suffering.

WWII Internment	ICE Warehouse Detention
Civil confinement	Civil confinement
No criminal charges	No criminal charges
Group-based targeting	Status-based targeting
Remote facilities	Remote mega-facilities
Limited legal access	Limited legal access
Later acknowledged as unjust	Outcome still unfolding

Courts eventually repudiated Korematsu v. United States. The harm, however, had already been done.

Scale Is the Trigger for Constitutional Failure

As detention scales, oversight collapses.

Independent data shows:

ICE detention has reached record highs, exceeding 68,000 people
The majority of detainees have no criminal convictions

Sources:

HLG analysis:

The No-Criminal-Record Crackdown: Who ICE Is Really Detaining

“This Is Not Criminal Incarceration”—And That’s the Problem

Because detention is civil:

There is no sentencing limit
Release is discretionary
Transfers can sever attorney-client relationships

This is why speed matters more than guilt—and why warehouse detention is uniquely dangerous.

HLG enforcement context:

U.S. Citizens Are Already Being Caught in the System

Wrongful detention is not hypothetical.

Major reporting has documented U.S. citizens mistakenly detained by ICE due to database errors and misidentification:

Warehouse detention multiplies this risk.

Deaths, Medical Neglect, and the Cost of Volume

As detention has grown, deaths in ICE custody have increased.

Washington Post: ICE custody deaths reach highest level in decades

HLG mental health reporting:

Mental Health Crisis for Children and Adults Due to ICE Raids (2025 Update)

Costs are also enormous:

Hundreds of dollars per detainee per day
Billions annually as capacity expands

HLG cost breakdown:

ICE Arrest, Detention, and Deportation Costs: What the Data Shows

Are We Repeating History—or Just Its Logic?

Congress later apologized for WWII internment and paid reparations. Courts acknowledged the constitutional failure.

None of that prevented the harm when it mattered.

The lesson is not about intent—it is about structures that enable mass civil confinement without effective guardrails.

WHAT TO DO NEXT (FOR FAMILIES)

If you or a loved one is detained:

The first 24–72 hours are decisive
Do not sign documents without legal review
Track transfers aggressively
Retain experienced detention counsel immediately

Step-by-step guidance:

WHY THIS ARTICLE MATTERS

This is not about labels.
It is about history, law, and scale.

America has confined civilians before—and later regretted it.
Whether today’s system follows the same path depends on what happens now.

Confidential consultations are available:
Schedule a consultation with Herman Legal Group

Frequently Asked Questions: America’s New Concentration Camps & ICE Warehouse Detention

What does “America’s new concentration camps” mean in this context?

The term refers to mass civil confinement without criminal charges, not extermination camps. It describes a detention system where people are confined based on immigration status, processed in bulk, and held in large, warehouse-style facilities with limited access to courts and lawyers.

Is immigration detention criminal punishment?

No. Immigration detention is legally civil, not criminal. People are detained without being charged with or convicted of a crime, which means fewer procedural protections apply.

Has the United States detained civilians like this before?

Yes. During World War II, the U.S. government confined more than 120,000 Japanese Americans, most of them citizens, without criminal charges. That policy was later acknowledged as unjust and unconstitutional.

How is ICE’s warehouse detention similar to WWII internment?

Both systems involve civil confinement, group-based targeting, limited individualized hearings, and remote facilities that restrict access to legal counsel. The historical lesson is about structure, not identical outcomes.

How many people does ICE plan to detain under this new system?

Investigative reporting indicates ICE is planning for capacity exceeding 80,000 detainees, far higher than historical norms.

Is ICE detention already at a record high?

Yes. ICE detention reached record levels in late 2025, with tens of thousands of people held daily.

Are most ICE detainees violent criminals?

No. Data shows that nearly two-thirds of ICE detainees have no criminal convictions. Many are detained solely for civil immigration violations.

Can U.S. citizens be detained by ICE?

Yes. U.S. citizens have been wrongfully detained due to database errors, mistaken identity, or lack of verification. Large-scale detention increases this risk.

Why are warehouses being used instead of jails?

Warehouses allow rapid expansion, centralized processing, and high-volume transfers, which support fast deportation logistics but reduce oversight and individualized review.

What is a “feeder system” in immigration detention?

It is a hub-and-spoke model where people are first detained locally and then transferred to large regional facilities for processing and removal.

Why do transfers matter so much legally?

Transfers disrupt attorney access, delay filings, cause missed deadlines, and separate families from information. In mass systems, transfers can happen with little or no notice.

Does detention mean deportation is inevitable?

No. Detention does not automatically mean deportation, but delay and lack of early legal action can severely limit defense options.

Why are the first 72 hours after detention so important?

The first 24–72 hours often determine bond eligibility, prevent harmful paperwork from being signed, and preserve legal defenses before transfers occur.

What should families do immediately after an ICE arrest?

Families should confirm location and A-number, avoid signing documents, gather records, track transfers, and contact experienced detention counsel immediately.

Is warehouse detention more dangerous for detainees?

Large detention systems historically face higher risks of medical neglect, mental health crises, and oversight failures, especially when capacity expands quickly.

How much does mass detention cost taxpayers?

Detaining tens of thousands of people costs billions of dollars annually, often through private contractors paid per detainee per day.

Who profits from detention expansion?

A broad contractor ecosystem benefits, including detention operators, transport companies, medical providers, staffing vendors, and facility retrofit firms.

Can detention be challenged in court?

Yes. In some cases—especially prolonged detention or due process violations—federal court challenges may be available.

Are Americans supportive of mass detention policies?

Polling shows support declines sharply when voters learn about large-scale detention, non-criminal confinement, and family separation impacts.

Is this system permanent?

No. Like WWII internment, policies built on emergency logic can later be reversed—but often only after harm has already occurred.

What is the biggest mistake families make?

Waiting. Mass detention systems move faster than families expect, and delay can permanently close legal doors.

Why does history matter in today’s immigration debate?

History shows that civil confinement systems expand quietly, face little resistance at first, and are often acknowledged as wrong only years later.

What is the main warning of this article?

That civil detention without strong guardrails fails at scale, regardless of intent, and that early legal intervention is the only reliable safeguard.

Comprehensive Resource Directory

ICE Warehouse Detention, Civil Confinement, Historical Parallels, Data, Legal Rights, and Emergency Response

1) Core Investigative Reporting on ICE Warehouse Detention

2) ICE Detention Data, Statistics, and Independent Dashboards

Herman Legal Group data analysis:

3) Historical Sources: WWII Internment and Civil Confinement

These sources document civil detention without criminal charges, later acknowledged as unconstitutional and unjust.

4) Civil vs. Criminal Detention: Legal Framework and Due Process

Herman Legal Group legal guides:

5) Non-Criminal Detention and Who ICE Is Really Holding

Herman Legal Group analysis:

The No-Criminal-Record Crackdown: Non-Criminal ICE Arrests

6) Wrongful Detention of U.S. Citizens

7) Conditions of Confinement, Deaths, and Medical Neglect

Herman Legal Group mental health reporting:

Mental Health Crisis for Children and Adults Due to ICE Raids – 2025 Update

8) Contractors, Private Detention, and Oversight

9) Finding Someone Detained by ICE & Court Status

Locate a detainee

Check immigration court status

10) Emergency Response: First 72 Hours After an ICE Arrest

Herman Legal Group step-by-step guides:

11) Public Opinion, Politics, and Enforcement Risk

Pew Research: Growing shares say deportations have gone too far

12) Legal Help and Confidential Consultation

Schedule a confidential consultation with Herman Legal Group

Success Stories

America’s New Concentration Camps: What ICE’s Warehouse Detention Reveals About Civil Confinement in the U.S.

Table of Contents