Table of Contents

By law, it is within the discretion of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services to grant the I-192 waiver of inadmissibility. As noted before, the Admissibility Review Office must weigh the following factors when deciding whether or not to grant a waiver application pursuant to INA § 212(d)(3):

  1. The risk of harm to society if the applicant is admitted;
  2. The seriousness of the applicant’s immigration law, or criminal law violation, if any; and
  3. The nature of the applicant’s reasons for wishing to enter the United States.
    Matter of Hranka, 16 I&N Dec. 491, 492 (BIA 1978).

While the Admissibility Review Office (ARO) weighs the positive and negative factors that apply in each applicant’s case, there are certain instances that may lead to an automatic denial: Failure to attend your biometric services appointment (if applicable), may result in a denial of your I-601 application.

Failure to provide the information requested by USCIS, including your Social Security Number (if applicable), and any other requested evidence could either delay the final decision or result in denial of a waiver.

Also note that knowingly and willfully falsifying or concealment of a material fact or submitting false documentation with your Form I-192 may not only lead to a denial of your waiver request, but may also allow USCIS to deny you of any other immigration benefit, and you may face severe penalties provided by law and may be subject to criminal prosecution. Never lie on your application!

If denied, form I-192 applicants will usually be notified of the reason(s) for denial. Pursuant to 8 CFR § 212.17(b)(3), there is no right to appeal of a decision to deny a waiver.

However, applicants are not prevented from re-filing or submitting a subsequent waiver request in appropriate cases, such as if the applicant has obtained additional evidence in support of a grant of approval.

Although there are no appeals of a decision of denial, the applicant may appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office to determine whether the director was correct in the finding of inadmissibility. This distinction may be confusing for some, so it is important to communicate with your immigration attorney to discuss your best options.

Richard T. Herman, immigration attorney and founder of Herman Legal Group
Founder
Richard T. Herman is a U.S. immigration attorney and founder of Herman Legal Group. He has practiced immigration law for more than 30 years, representing individuals, families and employers in immigration matters throughout the United States.
Why trust Richard T. Herman? Founder of Herman Legal Group, more than 30 years of immigration law practice, co-author of Immigrant, Inc., and a Super Lawyers selection every year from 2004 through 2025.

Recent Resource Articles

Attorney Richard Herman shares his wealth of knowledge through our free blog.

immigrant belonging Cleveland. Diverse immigrant families and community members gather near the Cleveland skyline, symbolizing immigrant belonging, civic power, and the future of Cleveland.

Cleveland Celebrates Immigrants. But Does It Share Power With Them?

Cleveland celebrates immigrant heritage through the Cultural Gardens, One World
new CPT rule 2026

New CPT Rule 2026: ICE Narrows F-1 Student Internships Without Changing the Regulation

ICE has sharply narrowed Curricular Practical Training eligibility for F-1

Book Your Consultation

Honest Advice. Multilingual Team. Decades of Experience. Get the Clarity and Support you Deserve.

Contact us

Head Office OH

408 West Saint Clair Avenue, Suite 230 Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone Number

+1-216-696-6170