Who is the judge in your Cleveland case?
Check the judge assigned to your case in your current notice and EOIR records. For current staffing, use the official Cleveland court directory. A staffing roster is different from a case assignment.
The outcome figures below are historical, for FY2019–FY2024. They are not a current judge roster or a prediction of your result.
Asylum outcomes by judge, FY2019–FY2024
These figures come from TRAC at Syracuse University, which compiles judge-level asylum merits decisions from EOIR data.
| Judge |
Asylum grant % (other relief %) |
Denial % |
| David C. Whipple |
43.1% (5.4%) |
56.9% |
| Michael A. Tripi |
34.8% (0.8%) |
65.1% |
| Jeremy J. Santoro |
30.8% (6.4%) |
69.2% |
| Richard Drucker |
23.8% (0.0%) |
76.2% |
| Donald Pashayan |
21.4% (4.6%) |
73.9% |
| Bruce D. Imbacuan |
20.5% (9.3–16.5%) |
70.2–80.9% |
| Monte J. Horton |
20.2% (2.4%) |
79.8% |
| Teresa Riley |
20.1% (3.5%) |
79.9% |
| Jennifer M. Riedthaler-Williams |
16.6–20.8% (4.2%) |
79.2–83.4% |
| Jonathan Owens (now ACIJ) |
15.3% (4.0%) |
80.7% |
| Patrick Burke |
Insufficient published decisions |
— |
| Hurst, Radin, Rice, Schroth |
No published Cleveland record for this period; more recently assigned to the court |
TRAC data is historical and lags the current roster. Figures describe past decisions in asylum merits cases only; they do not describe bond, cancellation or other relief, and they do not predict any individual outcome. Check TRAC directly for current figures.
What the spread actually means for your case
Cleveland grant rates cluster between roughly 15% and 43%. The national asylum grant rate has run near the middle of that band in recent years, and some courts elsewhere post far higher rates. Variation of this size is a documented feature of the system, not a reflection of case merit.
Practically, it means three things. Corroborate early — country-conditions evidence, expert declarations, psychological evaluations and third-party affidavits carry weight that testimony alone may not. Get the technical filing right, because incomplete or unsigned applications can be pretermitted without a merits hearing. Preserve your issues — nexus, particular social group, credibility and the CAT standard — in the record below, because the Board reviews what was raised there.
A motion to change venue is sometimes raised in this context. It is available only where it reflects your actual residence, not as a way to shop for a judge.