Table of Contents

The Great I-130 Slowdown 2026: Delays in Family Petitions

Since late 2025, U.S. spouse I-130 petitions from at least 19 “high-risk” or “travel-ban” countries appear to be moving more slowly, going missing in “security review,” or getting bounced between USCIS, the new Atlanta vetting center, and the State Department — even when the couples are “clean” and otherwise approvable.

This slowdown does not appear in a single neat public memo called “I-130 slowdown,” but instead shows up as:

  • A new USCIS national-security vetting center pulling cases by nationality. (USCIS)
  • A formal nationwide “benefit freeze” memo (PM-602-0192) suspending decisions for nationals of 19 travel-ban countries. (Herman Legal Group LLC)
  • DHS and USCIS rules re-emphasizing “screening and vetting” and shortening benefit validity periods to allow more frequent re-checks. (USCIS)
  • Growing gaps between official “normal” processing times and what families from certain countries are actually experiencing. (USCIS e-Gov)

For millions of families, this “invisible” I-130 slowdown is likely to shape who actually gets a marriage green card in 2026 — and who is quietly parked in limbo.

The I-130 slowdown 2026 is impacting many families as they navigate the immigration process.

 

 

I-130 slowdown 2026

 

 

1. What We Mean by “The Great I-130 Slowdown”

This article focuses on family-based I-130 spouse petitions (immediate relative and F2A) where:

  • The U.S. petitioner is a citizen or green-card holder.
  • The foreign spouse is from one of roughly 19 “high-risk” / travel-ban countries or closely associated countries.
  • The case would ordinarily be straightforward, but has now hit unexplained, nationality-linked delays.

For background on how I-130 spouse cases normally work, we cross-reference Herman Legal Group’s core guides:

Historically, I-130 spouse petitions for immediate relatives often tracked national median USCIS processing times fairly closely. Today, the I-130 slowdown 2026 has led to nationwide medians masking a very different story for certain nationalities. (USCIS e-Gov)

 

 

 

 

2. The 19+ Countries at the Center of the Slowdown

USCIS’s internal memo PM-602-0192—covered in Herman Legal Group’s explainer “Frozen Files: USCIS PM-602-0192 Freeze”—orders officers to hold benefit decisions for nationals of the 19 “high-risk” countries listed in Presidential Proclamation 10949 (the renewed travel-ban list). (Herman Legal Group LLC)

Those countries typically include:

  • Afghanistan
  • Iran
  • Somalia
  • Sudan
  • Yemen
  • Libya
  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Haiti
  • Burundi
  • Cuba
  • Venezuela
  • Laos
  • Sierra Leone
  • Togo
  • Turkmenistan

Depending on the final implementation, additional countries may be functionally “added” through vetting practices and consular risk profiles.

Herman Legal Group’s blacklist deep dive, “Trapped by the New Travel-Ban Visa & Green Card Blacklist”, explains how these lists intersect with family, employment, and humanitarian cases. (Herman Legal Group LLC)

Key point: PM-602-0192 does not say “I-130 spouse petitions” in the title, but it sweeps them in as “benefit requests” for anyone whose country of birth or citizenship is on the list.

 

 

 

I-130 spouse petition stuck in security review 2026 why is my I-130 still actively reviewed for a year I-130 nationality-based delay for high-risk countries USCIS vetting center Atlanta holding spouse petitions PM-602-0192 freeze effect on marriage green cards I-130 delays for spouses from banned countries

 

 

3. How USCIS and DHS Have Quietly Re-Engineered Vetting

Near the top of this story is a fundamental shift toward continuous, nationality-driven vetting. That shift is visible in:

In other words, spouses from these countries are now caught in a system designed for permanent suspicion and repeated re-screening, not one-time adjudication.

 

 

 

writ of mandamus for stuck I-130 spouse case how to sue USCIS for unreasonable delay 2026 I-130 case frozen with no RFE or interview FBI name check delay for spouse visa 2026 pending I-130 separated families 2026 high-risk nationality spouse visa delays travel ban countries impact on marriage visas

4. Data Snapshot: What the Numbers Say (and Don’t Say)

4.1 Official USCIS numbers

USCIS publishes:

Those data sets show:

  • I-130 medians went up sharply during the pandemic, then improved slightly for some categories.
  • Normal “all-office” medians in 2024–2025 could look reasonable (for example, in the 10–14 month range for some immediate-relative categories), masking outliers and nationality-based holds.

4.2 What’s missing

What USCIS does not publish:

  • Median I-130 processing times by nationality.
  • A public list of cases flagged under PM-602-0192.
  • The number of spouse petitions diverted to the Atlanta vetting center or CIV queue.

That gap is why reporters, data journalists, and policy analysts are now triangulating:

  • USCIS published medians;
  • Crowd-sourced timelines from Reddit and immigrant communities;
  • Case-status patterns (months/years of “Case Was Received” or “Actively Reviewed” with no RFE or interview);
  • New anecdotal patterns from immigration lawyers.

HLG’s own I-130 resources tracking these trends include:

 

 

how long security checks take for spouse visa digital privacy and border searches affecting green card cases secondary inspection patterns by nationality 2025–2026 I-130 delays for Africa and Middle East nationals impact of travel-ban expansion on family green cards USCIS freezing benefits for high-risk nationalities 2026 marriage green card stuck after biometrics why is my I-130 still pending with no update

5. How PM-602-0192 and the Vetting Center Translate Into I-130 Delays

Drawing on HLG’s “Frozen Files” and “Vetting Center High-Risk Countries” guides, here is how the slowdown typically plays out for spouse petitions:

5.1 Common patterns for nationals of the 19 countries

For a U.S. citizen or LPR sponsoring a spouse from a listed country, the I-130 may:

  • Sit for months or years in “Case Was Received” or “Actively Reviewed” status with no RFE, interview, or transfer. (Herman Legal Group LLC)
  • Generate vague notices like “held for review” or “extended security checks,” even when the couple has clean records.
  • Be silently routed to the Atlanta vetting center for “enhanced vetting,” often without any public explanation. (USCIS)

In more advanced cases:

  • Already-approved I-130s may be re-opened for “quality review” or possible revocation, especially where the beneficiary has prior travel to countries of concern or old security flags. (Herman Legal Group LLC)
  • Consular processing can stall at the NVC or embassy under broad “administrative processing,” with no printed mention of PM-602-0192.

5.2 Spillover to “non-listed” countries

Even spouses from non-listed countries feel the backlash:

  • USCIS resources are reallocated to high-risk vetting, causing longer queues for everyone. (Herman Legal Group LLC)
  • Embassies handling large flows from listed countries (e.g., in the Middle East, Africa, Caribbean) experience broader backlogs, affecting all nationalities in that post’s queue.

HLG’s marriage-based resources describing these ripple effects:

6. “Security Review,” Social Media, and the New Digital Scrutiny

The I-130 slowdown is inseparable from the broader shift toward digital and social-media vetting.

6.1 Social media and “continuous vetting”

  • DHS and CBP have systematically expanded social-media collection for visa applicants and visitors. (USAGov)
  • DHS’s Continuous Immigration Vetting (CIV) program specifically automates alerts based on new derogatory information in government databases. (Department of Homeland Security)

HLG’s related deep dives:

6.2 Travel-ban expansion & family cases

Recent reporting shows plans to widen the travel ban to 30+ countries, explicitly building on an earlier 19-country list and citing concerns about identity and terrorism. (The Guardian)

HLG’s own analysis ties this directly into family cases:

Spouses from listed countries are thus screened not only as would-be immigrants, but as potential security risks within an ever-expanding surveillance net.

7. What This Means for 2026 Green Cards (Visa Bulletin + NVC)

7.1 Immediate relatives vs. preference categories

For U.S. citizens sponsoring spouses, there is no numerical cap. In theory, once the I-130 is approved and background checks clear, the path to the green card is governed mainly by USCIS and NVC processing speed.

For green-card holders (F2A), spouses must watch both:

The I-130 slowdown introduces a third variable: whether a spouse’s nationality quietly drives the case into a security hold.

7.2 NVC and consular bottlenecks

After I-130 approval, many couples encounter:

  • “Documentarily complete” status stuck for months in the NVC queue.
  • Embassies in key regions (Middle East, North Africa, Caribbean, parts of Asia) with longer F2A/CR-1/IR-1 interview backlogs, especially for nationals of the 19 countries.

To track that layer, State now offers:

HLG practice-area and guide links that help put this in context:

8. Practical Checklist: If Your I-130 Spouse Case Is Stuck

For spouses (especially from the 19 countries) who suspect they’ve been pulled into the slowdown, Herman Legal Group typically focuses on:

  1. Confirming whether your delay is “normal” or extraordinary
  2. Auditing the strength of your petition package
  3. Preparing for—and using—RFEs strategically
  4. Checking for travel-ban or national-security flags
  5. Documenting hardship and delay for future escalation
    • Keep a detailed log of:
      • Every status change and inquiry response;
      • Lost job offers, medical issues, pregnancy, or child hardship;
      • Missed milestones (births, funerals, graduations) caused by separation.

This documentation becomes crucial if you eventually move to federal court (writ of mandamus).

9. Writs of Mandamus: The Nuclear Option for Stalled Spouse Petitions

9.1 What a writ of mandamus is — and is not

A writ of mandamus is a federal lawsuit asking a judge to order a government agency (USCIS, State, or both) to do its job — in this context, to make a decision on your long-delayed case.

Key points:

  • Mandamus cannot force approval; it can force action (approve, deny, or otherwise resolve).
  • It is usually considered when delay is far beyond normal processing times, often 12–24+ months outside published medians, especially with repeated non-answers about “security checks.” (Herman Legal Group LLC)

HLG’s related discussions of mandamus in other contexts:

9.2 When mandamus may make sense for I-130 spouses

For spouse petitions from the 19+ high-risk countries, mandamus may be realistic when:

  • The case is clearly clean and approvable on paper;
  • The file has spent many months or years beyond published USCIS medians;
  • Multiple service requests, congressional inquiries, and ombudsman requests have gone nowhere;
  • USCIS and/or the consulate repeatedly invoke vague national-security or “administrative processing” language without end.

Mandamus in this context is often about forcing transparency:

  • Is the case truly being vetted for legitimate reasons?
  • Or is it simply stuck in a never-ending “security check” with no one accountable?

9.3 Risks and downsides

Mandamus is powerful, but not free of risk:

  • The government can fight back: DOJ may defend the delay or accuse the case of being “complicated” due to undisclosed factors.
  • You may get a fast denial instead of an approval: For weak cases, mandamus may simply speed up a negative outcome.
  • Costs: Federal litigation requires legal fees and court costs; it is not a DIY form like an e-request.

Because of this, HLG generally reserves mandamus for:

  • Strong, well-documented marriage cases;
  • Extreme or nationality-linked delays;
  • Situations where separation is causing severe hardship (health, child development, safety abroad, etc.).

10. Story Angles and Data Ideas for Journalists & Researchers

If you are a reporter, policy analyst, or researcher, the “Great I-130 Slowdown” opens up multiple under-reported angles:

  1. Nationality-Specific Delays
    • Compare I-130 timelines for spouses from the 19 countries vs. spouses from non-listed countries.
    • Leverage anonymized attorney case data, Reddit timelines, and community-based surveys.
  2. Impact on U.S. Citizens and Children
    • Document how U.S. citizen spouses and U.S.-citizen children are effectively punished by nationality-based vetting of their foreign parent.
  3. Visa Bulletin vs. Reality
    • Overlay published Visa Bulletin movement with real I-130 + NVC timelines for F2A and IR-1/CR-1.
  4. Mandamus Litigation as a Pressure Valve
    • Track federal mandamus filings tagged to I-130 / I-485 / consular delays for nationals of the 19 countries.
    • Ask whether federal courts are becoming the de facto oversight of secret vetting lists.
  5. Chilling Effect of Continuous Vetting
    • Use DHS’s Continuous Immigration Vetting PIA and Brennan Center reporting on “continuous vetting” to explore how 24/7 surveillance affects free speech and digital self-censorship among immigrants. (Department of Homeland Security)

HLG’s broader policy-oriented pieces you can cross-reference:

11. FAQ: Common Questions About the I-130 Slowdown

Q1: Is there an official memo that says “we are slowing I-130s for these countries”?
No. The slowdown is the combined effect of PM-602-0192, the new vetting center, continuous vetting, and travel-ban expansions that happen to disproportionately hit nationals of these countries.

Q2: Does this affect spouses inside the U.S. (adjustment of status) and outside (consular)?
Yes. For spouses in the U.S., the I-130/I-485 package can be held or re-opened. For spouses abroad, NVC and consular processing may stall under “administrative processing” with no clear end date.

For AoS guidance, see:

Q3: If my spouse is from a non-listed country, should I still worry?
Yes, but for different reasons. Even if your spouse isn’t from a listed country, you may face longer queues and more detailed vetting because USCIS and DHS are spending more time on national-security screening overall.

Q4: Will a writ of mandamus guarantee approval?
No. It can compel action, not approval. That is why mandamus should be weighed carefully with an experienced immigration litigator familiar with travel-ban and vetting issues.

Q5: Is it safe to travel while my I-130/I-485 is pending and I’m from a listed country?
Travel is risky, especially with pending I-485s, advance parole, or fragile temporary status. See:

12. How Herman Legal Group Can Help Families Caught in the Slowdown

Herman Legal Group has:

  • 30+ years representing marriage-based couples, including from high-risk and travel-ban countries;
  • Hands-on experience with security-flagged I-130/I-485 cases, NVC delays, and consular “administrative processing”;
  • A growing track record in mandamus and federal-court strategies when USCIS or consulates simply stop moving.

Key marriage-based resources:

If your spouse’s I-130 has quietly stalled, especially from one of the 19+ countries, consider scheduling a confidential strategy session:

 

Resource Directory

Government & Official U.S. Sources

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

U.S. Department of State (DOS)

Media & Investigative Reporting

 

Advocacy, Rights & Policy Organizations


Scholarly & Technical Background on Vetting / Automation

Herman Legal Group – Deep-Dive Guides on Vetting, Travel Bans & Delays

USCIS Vetting & High-Risk Countries

Border Scrutiny, Secondary Inspection & Digital Privacy

Herman Legal Group – Marriage Green Cards, I-130 & Family Backlogs

HLG – RFEs, Interviews, Red Flags & Post-Interview Trouble

HLG – Oath Cancellations, Secondary Vetting & “Low-Risk” Immigrants

HLG – Policy, Crackdowns & Broader Context

Community & Crowd-Sourced Timeline Signals

 

 

Written By Richard Herman
Founder
Richard Herman is a nationally recognizeis immigration attorney, Herman Legal Group began in Cleveland, Ohio, and has grown into a trusted law firm serving immigrants across the United States and beyond. With over 30 years of legal excellence, we built a firm rooted in compassion, cultural understanding, and unwavering dedication to your American dream.

Recent Resource Articles

Attorney Richard Herman shares his wealth of knowledge through our free blog.

Trump 2025 immigration policies

Nothing Here Is Normal: Trump’s 2025 Immigration Shock to the System

Trump’s 2025 immigration agenda did not simply tighten the border

Book Your Consultation

Honest Advice. Multilingual Team. Decades of Experience. Get the Clarity and Support you Deserve.

Contact us

Head Office OH

408 West Saint Clair Avenue, Suite 230 Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone Number

+1-216-696-6170