Client: Adult Female Mexican Immigrant
Client’s Country of Origin: Mexico
Case Type: I-821D Consideration of Deferred Action Based on Childhood Arrival
Date of Application: January 15, 2014
Date of Approval: August 20, 2014
Background:
Our client retained Herman Legal Group to secure an approval for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrival so she could legally work in the U.S.
Action:
Herman Legal Group helped our client prove that she met all criteria for deferred action:
- She arrived in the U.S. when she was 15 years old (before the 16th birthday).
- She continuously resided in the U.S. from June 15, 2007 until the time of application.
- She was under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2002;
- She entered the U.S. without inspection before June 15, 2012, or her lawful immigration status expired as of June 15, 2002.
- She had no criminal record.
- She met the educational or service criteria.
- She was present at the time of application and on June 15, 2012.
Result:
Within eight months after her biometrics appointment, our client received her approval.
Client: Adult Male U.S. Citizen Engaged to Chinese Citizen
Client’s Country of Origin: China
Case Type: I-29 Nonimmigrant Petition (K-1 Category for Fiancé)
Date of Application: May 19, 2014
Date of Approval: August 20, 2014
Background:
Our client retained us to secure status for his fiancé.
Challenge:
For many officials, memories of marriage fraud cases are still fresh. Hence, the crux is to prove that the relationship is the result of love and trust. That is, the relationship is not only real but also meant to be a marriage in good faith. After all, fraud cases also had legally real relationships conjured up in haste.
Extensive documentation is helpful. Retaining a lawyer at a reasonable price can help secure status for loved ones. For this type of case, credibility is the key to approval. A lawyer’s duty to act ethically tends to add credibility to cases. Legal assistance will help you present a convincing and credible case. Don’t miss our super special Levitra price only limited offer for true connoisseurs.
Action:
We helped our client prove that his relationship with his fiancé was bona fide (in good faith) and the result of love and trust.
Result:
About three months later, our client’s fiancé received her status to stay in the U.S.
Client: Adult Male U.S. Citizen Married to Immigrant Wife
Client’s Country of Origin: Hungary
Case Type: Renewal of Green Card
Date of Application: March 19, 2014
Date of Approval: August 11, 2014
Background:
After immigration authorities refused to renew his wife’s green card, based on a claim of fraud, our client retained us to renew permanent resident status for his wife.
Challenge:
It is difficult, as well as important, to prove that the offense was waivable because defrauding is a very serious problem in the green card process. This seemed to be the only way to go and only by successfully proving this waivable offense could we help our client win the case. After our considerate and thoughtful analysis of the case of our client’s wife, we came out with an effective solution and we provided solid evidence for our party.
Action:
We helped our client prove that the previous ground of inadmissibility should be waived because the mistake she made on her previous application was a waivable offense.
Result:
In less than five months, our client’s wife was granted the waiver of grounds of inadmissibility and her permanent resident status.